{"id":3483,"date":"2016-03-14T14:05:00","date_gmt":"2016-03-14T14:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vc-law.local\/?post_type=case-result&#038;p=3483"},"modified":"2024-02-22T14:20:27","modified_gmt":"2024-02-22T14:20:27","slug":"troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer","status":"publish","type":"case-result","link":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/","title":{"rendered":"Troshina contra Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Fallo en el diagn\u00f3stico del c\u00e1ncer de mama"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Trajes y ofertas<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Troshina contra Zhuravelva, et. Alabama. \u2013 $1M por Negligencia M\u00e9dica<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Por Charles Toutant del New Jersey Law Journal<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Troshina contra Zhuravelva:<\/strong> Un jurado del condado de Hudson evalu\u00f3 $1 millones en da\u00f1os y perjuicios el 16 de diciembre contra un ginec\u00f3logo obstetra por no responder a una mamograf\u00eda anormal de una paciente. Pero el veredicto se redujo a $100.000 bas\u00e1ndose en las conclusiones del jurado de que el c\u00e1ncer de mama era una enfermedad preexistente.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Marina Troshina se reuni\u00f3 con la m\u00e9dica Karina Zhuravelva de Cliffside Park en febrero de 2006 despu\u00e9s de recibir el informe de un radi\u00f3logo de que su mamograf\u00eda result\u00f3 anormal. Los dos conversaron en ruso, el idioma nativo de Troshina. Afirm\u00f3 que Zhuravelva le dijo que no se preocupara por el informe y que las calcificaciones identificadas eran un signo normal de envejecimiento, dice su abogado, John Vlasac Jr. de Vlasac &amp; Cassidy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zhuravelva cuestion\u00f3 esa versi\u00f3n, pero dijo que no recordaba la cita, dice Vlasac.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">M\u00e1s de un a\u00f1o despu\u00e9s, Troshina desarroll\u00f3 un bulto en su seno izquierdo y le diagnosticaron un tumor canceroso. Se someti\u00f3 a una mastectom\u00eda radical, quimioterapia y disecci\u00f3n de un ganglio axilar. Posteriormente fue declarada libre de c\u00e1ncer, pero hubo un retraso de 482 d\u00edas en el tratamiento debido a la negligencia de Zhuravelva, seg\u00fan la demanda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El juez H\u00e9ctor Vel\u00e1zquez presidi\u00f3 el juicio que dur\u00f3 una semana. El jurado concluy\u00f3 que el c\u00e1ncer era una condici\u00f3n preexistente y atribuy\u00f3 el 75 por ciento de la causa inmediata de las lesiones a ese factor. Luego, el jurado atribuy\u00f3 el 60 por ciento de la culpa a Troshina por no buscar una segunda opini\u00f3n, lo que elev\u00f3 el veredicto a $100.000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zhuravelva estuvo representada por Robert Evers de Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman &amp; Goggin en Roseland, quien no devolvi\u00f3 la llamada.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-3483","case-result","type-case-result","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer - Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer - Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Suits and Deals Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. al. &#8211; $1M for Medical Malpractice By Charles Toutant of New Jersey Law Journal Troshina v. Zhuravelva: A Hudson County jury assessed $1 million in damages on Dec. 16 against an obstetrician gynecologist for failing to respond to a patient\u2019s abnormal mammogram. But the verdict was molded to [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-22T14:20:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/\",\"name\":\"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer - Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-14T14:05:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-22T14:20:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/\",\"name\":\"Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer - Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer - Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC","og_description":"Suits and Deals Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. al. &#8211; $1M for Medical Malpractice By Charles Toutant of New Jersey Law Journal Troshina v. Zhuravelva: A Hudson County jury assessed $1 million in damages on Dec. 16 against an obstetrician gynecologist for failing to respond to a patient\u2019s abnormal mammogram. But the verdict was molded to [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/","og_site_name":"Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC","article_modified_time":"2024-02-22T14:20:27+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/","name":"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer - Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-03-14T14:05:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-22T14:20:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-ES","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/case-result\/troshina-v-zhuravelva-et-al-failure-to-diagnose-breast-cancer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Troshina v. Zhuravelva, et. Al.- Failure to diagnose breast cancer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/","name":"Vlasac &amp; Cassidy Law LLC","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es-ES"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-result\/3483","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case-result"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case-result"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vclaws.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}